1. The graphic of stacey Matrix in your blog is that the original version of Stacey? I have a hard time tracing it, al the «good searchblog post» imo confuse Stacey / Cynefin. So I`m trying to get Stacey`s real (first) version, curious about how it was developed and ultimately «merged» with the Cynefin2 frame. If you read Stacey`s matrix, you can assume that there is news as part of Cynefin, since all this has already been said by Stacey. So I`m trying to figure out what «hype» is around a framework that simply puts new words into a job that`s already been done. I may be a little short-sighted or I don`t understand what Stacey originally meant. I understand that both people are a little concerned about the oversimplification and use of both ideas. But even though it may be a «bad» model, it helps people try to get their head around, why agile makes sense, but also when it`s not..:) Stacey`s matrix has security on the horizontal axis and consistency on the vertical axis. In my attemtp to copy Dave Snowden`s comments, I lost two built-in links. Here they are: «Now, for a start Rick Cynefin is not a matrix, his nascent frame.
If you read this, you`ll see how it`s created, so it can`t start with the two-dimensional intersection. It is a creative framework of meaning, constructed socially from the experience of the peoples of their past and also of their expected future. It is naturally derived from the triple classification of systems that are defined in terms of restrictions (the bit you like) you could (if you merged the simple and complicated and call it order, prefer this presentation. The main model is the three systems, Cynefin merely divides the order into simple and complicated, adding disorder to realize that human perception is also important. We live in a world of turbulence, uncertainty and ambiguity. The workplace is no longer a place of stability and, in most years, disagreements and uncertainties can be expected. The matrix formed from these two dimensions allows the user to draw projects, decisions or activities in one of the five zones, as shown in the image, and adopt a particular style of management and decision-making and leadership as a result. In times of uncertainty, the role of the leader is to make performance possible.
To free people from the chains of habit, standard operating procedures and conflict. Are you comfortable with insecurity? If not, what would you change? This area is characterized by a great deal of uncertainty, unpredictability and differences of opinion. In this area, there is no clarity on requirements, people or technology. There is severe turbulence; no direct link between cause and effect. None of the best or emerging best practices work in this area. Leadership must act first, sense and then react. Leaders must first bring order to the chaos and then seek solutions. Leadership in this area is entrepreneurship. Thanks for the Rick link, unfortunately I can`t find the matrix (at least not as a graph) in Stacey`s book «Strategic Management and Organizational Dynamics». «Although it is assumed that the above (in your article) is the actual version of Stacey, what is the message in Cynefin` framework? Curious about some thoughts, comments, etc.:) The art of management and leadership is to have a number of approaches and know when to use which approach.
Ralph Stacey proposed a matrix to help with this art by identifying management decisions in two dimensions: the degree of safety and the degree of agreement.