Another consequence of an obligation arising from the underlying debtor`s obligation is that the guarantee becomes the creditor`s successor until the amount it meets on behalf of the debtor (Article 596 of the Code). On the other hand, the surety could only appeal to the debtor if the agreement between him and the debtor provided for it. Security agreements are defined overall as agreements by which a third party takes the risk of another party. A more concrete example would be a situation in which a third party takes the risk resulting from the non-performance of an obligation by another party. In order to define the scope and limits of «security agreements,» it is also necessary to define what «security» is. A fixed asset may be a specified asset that, in the event of a third party`s risk or personal entity by which the beneficiary of the guarantee is authorized to require the use of the company`s assets, would be cashed or liquidated. Under all of this, creditors may prefer to enter into a guarantee agreement, as the bond obligation (unlike a guarantee agreement) is separate from the debtor`s underlying obligation, making it more difficult for the party to denote the guarantee of avoiding the benefit under the guarantee agreement. Whether or not a guarantee agreement (and the terms of such an agreement) can be obtained would be within the negotiating power of the parties. In that case, I have to remove someone as collateral, just in case. The amendments to Turkish right of obligation No. 6098 («code») to the guarantee agreements (known in Turkish as «kefalet szle-meleri») have been a hot topic of discussion, not only among practitioners, but also in the general public, because of certain changes made by the code to the procedural requirements of a guarantee, such as the need to obtain approval.B.